WorldNetDaily asks, "Whom would you most like to see take on Obama in 2012? "

WorldNetDaily asks, "Whom would you most like to see take on Obama in 2012? "

World NetDaily 's featured poll asks "Whom you most like to see take on Obama in 2012?" First, look at the potential Republicans listed in the poll linked below and the percentage of support for each. Then ask yourself, what sane Constitutionally loyal American patriot sees anything good in nearly any of these listed Republicans?

Only one has positions close to the Founders, Ron Paul, and he is getting too old to run again. If he did, his own party (and Rush, Hannity, Ingram, Medved and Beck) would just marginalize and savage him like they did in 2007-8. With his party's and conservative talk radio's support, Paul could have won, and won big. Many Democrats loved him, but the Federal Reserve backed, NeoCon Republican military industrial complex (War, Inc.) hated him. Michael Medved has already said on the radio he didn't know if he could support Rand Paul, a Republican, for Senate!

Look at what the 3rd District Washington Republicans did to Michael Delavar when he ran against Brian Baird. They quickly put up a NeoCon gal to run against him. But, when he beat her in the primary, they still didn't support him, a Republican, in the general election! And they want us to be loyal to them?

Nearly all Republicans support the imperial presidency of Lincoln, war, war, and more war - now even preemptively (esp. for the Israelis), international corporations with no loyalty to America, and the never ending chasing those hobgoblins of terror, poverty, drugs, etc. to further restrict our rights.

Iraq wasn't a threat, but China is. Want a war? Why not preemptively bomb communist China? That makes much more sense? Think about it: Our national debt would disappear, our jobs would return. A two-fer.

I do sympathize with the Republicans dilemma; how does any party lure the potential voters away from the status quo - with the nice (unlawful) government benefits handed out to the voter base by the Democrats? How does any party attract voters with the demand for personal responsibility and self-sufficiency? Hard sell, huh?

The Republican counter to the Democrats is slightly smaller über-federal government with a quasi-Lincoln-king president and eternal false flag initiated war as a sacrament? We don't need more laws and police - we need more personal fear of God, much less state government, and virtually no federal government. Parlez-vous Article 1, Section 8? We need to make Social Security, Medicare, school lunches, government welfare, illegal immigration (invasion), executive orders and the Federal Reverse Board as extinct as the Dodo bird.

Consider that in spite of tens of millions of registered Republicans, the party ran John McCain as their presidential candidate? John McCain? Think about that. And as his running mate, he picks (?) a nice gal, and governor of Alaska - with the Israeli flag in her office?

Read the Constitution, the Constitutional Convention and debates as recorded by Elliott, the Federalist Papers, the Founders and then look at the link below - and weep. Respond if you like. I can't, WorldNetDaily has permanently banned me from voting or commenting on its site.

Whom you most like to see take on Obama in 2012?

http://forums.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=575

WWTFFS?

(What Would The Founding Fathers Say?) Plug your ears!

----------------------------------------------------------